The Book of Numbers: Analyzing the ROI on the Pursuit of Women - Aaron Clarey Audiobook
Language: EnglishKeywords:
Analyzing ROI
Pursuit Of Women
The Book Of Numbers
Shared by:kingabomination
Written by
Read by Kevin Sapp
Format: M4B
Unabridged
you can split this up yourself by chapter to mp3 format with yermak/AudioBookConverter. its a free opensource software on GitHub. Alternatively use Smart Audiobook player with .m4b format. This is my preferred method.
Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/AaronClarey/videos
The world economy and its entire, historic, economic production has been fueled by one thing, and one thing only - sex. Specifically, men’s desire to have sex with young and beautiful females. It’s not specifically female youth and beauty per se, as much as it is the fertility these things signal. But make no mistake, female youth and beauty has powered the world economy since the beginning of time. And men are the economic engines that run on it.
Consequently, in their pursuit of women, men have not only produced nearly every penny of GDP, but have created nearly every technological innovation in the history of the world. They’ve built civilizations from the ground up. Cured diseases through amazing medical advances. Laid incredible multitrillion dollar transportation and communications infrastructures. And it isn’t even these great, Herculean achievements of man, as much as it is the daily grind billions of men today and in the past went through to attract wives and support families.
From waking up in the morning to going to school, to suffering a commute to working overtime, to hitting the gym to majoring in STEM, to going to war, and even to the granular level of choosing which shirt to buy or what car to finance, nearly all of a man’s post-pubescent life is directly or indirectly dedicated toward the pursuit of women. And if there were no women, $90 trillion in global GDP and $360 trillion in wealth would simply disappear overnight. And the army of 50 billion men who’ve existed on this planet would never have produced the $3 quadrillion in total historic GDP that built society. Without female youth and beauty, humanity would simply not exist.
But there is an opposite side to this total, historical, global GDP coin. Because while society screams bloody murder over wealth and income gaps between the sexes, nobody asks how all this economic production, let alone these financial disparities, came about. And while men no doubt out-earn women and own the lion’s share of global wealth, it is only because for every penny of GDP, a man’s labor was put into it. That for every technological innovation, a man paid a price in terms of time, effort, toil, and mental energy. And the $90 trillion in global GDP we see today is not just cryptically “the total economic production of the world”, but can also be viewed as the total price men pay for their pursuit of women.
And this essay asks just one simple question - “Is it worth it?”
To date, no serious economic analysis has been conducted on what is nothing short of the most important economic question facing men. And since men will likely account for the majority of economic production and technical innovation in the future, this also makes it the most important economic question facing the world. However, while the economic ramifications of men’s pursuit of women are truly global, this essay has no grandiose ideas of convincing the world, let alone the economics profession, about the importance of whether it’s in men’s best interests to continue this pursuit. It only cares about the individual man reading this essay and whether the pursuit of women is personally worth it to him. In that regard, this essay aims to inform the reader about the real mathematical chances of success he faces in the pursuit of women, as well as the modern-day risks, so that he may make an informed economic decision as to how he best invests his life. It also aims to align the reader’s expectations with reality so his life is not ruined by delusion or hope, both of which have ruined millions of lives in the past. But in short, this essay is nothing less than the most important cost-benefit analysis any man will read, which makes it mandatory reading for any man who wishes to take his life seriously.
| Announce URL: | http://googer.cc:1337/announce |
| This Torrent also has several backup trackers | |
| Tracker: | http://googer.cc:1337/announce |
| Tracker: | http://open.acgnxtracker.com:80/announce |
| Tracker: | http://tracker2.dler.org:80/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://exodus.desync.com:6969/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://open.stealth.si:80/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://opentor.org:2710/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.dler.org:6969/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.opentrackr.org:1337/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.tiny-vps.com:6969/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.torrent.eu.org:451/announce |
| Creation Date: | Fri, 17 Sep 2021 22:51:05 +0200 |
| This is a Multifile Torrent | |
| Aaron Clarey - The Book of Numbers Analyzing the ROI on the Pursuit of Women (Kevin Sapp).m4b 37.25 MBs | |
| File Size: | 37.25 MBs |
| Piece Size: | 256 KBs |
| Comment: | Updated by Education Audiobook |
| Info Hash: | dea23098039944bd9180c226013ae92a605683a4 |
| Torrent Download: | Torrent Free Downloads |
| Tips: | Sometimes the torrent health info isn’t accurate, so you can download the file and check it out or try the following downloads. |
| Direct Download: | Start Direct Download |
| Tips: | You could try out alternative bittorrent clients. |
| Secured Download: | Download Files Now |
| AD: |
|
This post has 62 comments with rating of 3/5
September 17th, 2021
Awesome!!!
September 17th, 2021
Awesome!!!
September 17th, 2021
More from bs from the incel cult.
September 17th, 2021
Yikes, that’s pathetic.
September 17th, 2021
Jesus, miss me with the moralist shaming nonsense. you’re literally on a site stealing copyrighted content. your not a good person, your laying to yourself. you mascaraed behind moralism, but your clearly not moral, lmao. Go find someone gullible.
September 17th, 2021
The Incel Manifesto.
September 17th, 2021
I met my wife the old fashioned way. We looked in each others eyes and knew we were for each other. No math involved. Many decades later still going strong.
September 17th, 2021
the fake moralist white knight comment trap.
September 17th, 2021
Impulsive overdefensiveness is self-revealing, especially if your a internet indoctrinated incel.
September 17th, 2021
I have never mascaraed behind anything, sir, and I resent the implication. (I’m more of a fake lashes guy–go big or go home.)
September 18th, 2021
The “you should be a functional sociopath because money is all that matters” argument was never very credible. I used to have a lot of money and was miserable. Now I have a partner and less money and am less miserable. The less money has nothing to do with my partner, for the record, who costs me nothing but does help with bills. So I guess my ROI on my relationship would be -50% bills and therefore positive. I see now, the author actually thinks women are good for one’s ROI but the author is too bad at language to express this clearly.
Whomever wrote the blurb on this would be well served to study history. And logic for that matter. The contention that women haven’t contributed anything is only tenable if one ignores where people come from. Perhaps the author is a proponent of spontaneous generation and believes children spring from under cabbage leaves. This level of scientific understanding would also explain the author’s lack of familiarity with contributions women have made in the sciences, credited and not.
September 18th, 2021
I will add, to the aptly named kingabomination that, while, yes, we are thieves, there are people even we thieves look down on and hold moral superiority to. Those who claim that half the population is largely incapable of rational thought, and therefore inferior to the other half, would be one such group.
Its like racism, but with an entitlement complex to the bodies of the people your sort purports to hate. A lie that only sustains itself through the careful admission of pertinent facts. We may be thieves, but you have an illness of logic. We can always stop stealing. You, on the other hand…
September 18th, 2021
This is the kind of thing I expect to be released to the press by a mass shooter, tbh
September 18th, 2021
looks like I hit home. only bombers over the target get this much flak.
September 18th, 2021
“Man is by nature a political animal.”
Aristotle
“Politics have no relation to morals.”
Niccolo Machiavelli
September 18th, 2021
Are the stars on this website rating the torrent or the book?
while I love reading peoples reviews on here, this isn’t goodreads. I’m pretty sure the stars were intended to represent torrent quality and not if you agreed with what was in a book or not.
Still rather interesting to read the scalding opinion, not sure if it’s my thing but thanks for sharing.
September 18th, 2021
I feel like people are just sick of toxic masculinity in all it’s forms. this basically ignores all the women or non-binary male inventors and scientific ground-breakers, or anyone who every did anything for a reason other than sex.
It’s the kind of perspective that wants to rationalize the historical gender imbalance and excuse the hetero white men out there trashing the planet and society.
September 18th, 2021
Ho can you also upload reconisance man also by Aaron clarey?
September 18th, 2021
The real problem is if you’re not following the agenda they will label you as toxically masculine. This is why it looks like masculinity is the problem. It’s called word association, or anchors and triggers in neuro linguistic programming. If you got enough people to start calling their hands feet it would only take 2 or 3 generations to make it stick. This is nothing new. It’s been slowly ramping up since the 60’s. There was nothing wrong with feminism in the beginning but it’s been co-opted for nefarious purposes since it’s inception.
September 18th, 2021
You think that’s the real problem? A female friend of mine was denied medical care because the male doctor claimed her cancer symptoms were actually a period. That kind of brush off is a common problem for women in medical care. I, a man, have to go with several of my well educated adult female friends to medical appointments because they’re scared their symptoms will be dismissed as ‘lady time.’ Because they often are dismissed in that way. And if they stand up for themselves the doctors refuse care. But nothing bad happens if I, a white male, stand up for them, in fact, good things happen: they get treatment.
I actually own a book on gynecology so I can call the doctors on their nonsense in an educated manner, because I’ve had to before. I’ve had to explain that periods don’t cause tachycardia, or fevers, or acute kidney pain, or MRSA. To doctors. So my friends would receive medical care. And not be sent home until they have to call an ambulance after their conditions get so bad that they’re taken seriously. And you think the problem is word association? Neat.
Everyone has a bad time no matter their sex, race or creed. And everyone thinks they’ve got it worse than everyone else. But you know, I’ve never been told my observable medical symptoms weren’t real because of my gender.
Maybe make some female friends and ask them about this stuff. Do it as a social experiment if you have to think of it that way. You’ll probably learn a lot. If you treat women like everyone else you’ll quickly learn that they are.
September 18th, 2021
Your the Prize Many thanks.
September 18th, 2021
Sounds like they should go to a different doctor. Were you trying to give me the perfect example? You just blamed incompetence on masculinity. Turns out I have a mother. She’s Mormon, so you can imagine I’m very good at spotting confirmation bias. Same basic principle being used, different scam.
September 18th, 2021
Find a nice lady at church and marry her. I have noticed this always seems to work over the years.
September 18th, 2021
Thanks for sharing, much appreciated, though it seems to have triggered some cognitive dissonance!
September 18th, 2021
To say that this kind of stuff takes a negatively reductive approach to the bewildering complexity of human relationships - & the reality of genuine mutual understanding - would be wholly inadequate.
Yeah, there are horrible people out there, toxic men & women, but it’s slightly unhealthy to allow that to colour & distort your entire life.
September 18th, 2021
All understanding comes from breaking something down into smaller parts. That’s why They don’t teach calculus in kindergarten. Reality doesn’t care about your perception of it, or if you find it pretty. Most things exist for efficiency’s sake. It’s quite disturbing the amount of people that would try and shame others into adopting they’re naive perspective. The only people that would benefit from that are the parasites of the world. “To know what people really think, pay attention to what they do, rather than what they say.” Renè Descartes
September 18th, 2021
“Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never merely as a means to an end, but always at the same time as an end.” ― Immanuel Kant
The old formula of humanity.
Or that earlier ethic of reciprocity: “Do unto others” - a core principle & expression of natural law, to be found in so many of our traditions. Just update it & give it new life for slow learners.
September 19th, 2021
The naivete never stops around here. Yes the old formula that no one is fallowing anymore. Your reasoning is flawed. Would you give the do unto others advice to a masochist? These people exist whether you want to admit it or not.
“Dissect your emotions deeper. You will find that no one has ever done anything holy for others. All actions are self-directed, all service is self-serving, all love self-loving.”
Irvin Yalom
Some of us have come to terms of this reality while others are still pretending their motives aren’t selfish.
September 19th, 2021
Maybe the author will one day leave his parents’ basement and actually speak to a woman, and then change some of his theories.
September 19th, 2021
making a statement so easily disproven only makes you look ignorant.
September 19th, 2021
Last word trolls are the most overcompensating and self-revealing.
September 19th, 2021
lmao I would be doing a disservice to mankind if I let ignorance linger without a rebuttal. you could say something intelligent and I wouldn’t have to rebuke you.
September 19th, 2021
‘Mature love is loving, not being loved.’ Irvin D. Yalom
Isn’t your other Yalom quote also mere assertion?
Of course some motives are selfish - so that must mean that absolutely all motives are ipso facto selfish, without exception? That just sounds like Kevin, the despairing adolescent. Once he gets a ride, he’ll be grand.
“Yes the old formula that no one is following anymore.” - Do you have detailed stats to support the “no one” claim - or just another ass-ertion? Society hasn’t progressed beyond the brute vengeance code of old? More flawed reasoning? Or is the real tragedy here that you have encountered such few decent people, or chose to ignore their example, in the hopes of having a bit of the old rumpy pumpy?
The masochist exception proving the rule - now you’re just flogging a dead something-or-other.
September 19th, 2021
I’ll give you an extreme example since you still don’t understand. Let’s say you give a homeless person money. That homeless person can’t do anything for you so it seems you just did it to be nice. In actuality you did it because it makes you feel good about yourself. It could also be because you believe in karma and it’ll come back around. Possibly you think God will reward you in some way. Regardless of your reason you’re getting something out of it. I never asserted masochism proves the rule. It proves you should always be wary of other people and their intentions. Especially when people can’t see the forest for the trees as you just proven.
September 19th, 2021
You prove my point: people have mixed motives. Conduct is not purely one thing, or the other. As I said, human relationships are bewilderingly complex, and cannot be reduced to single motives. That would be puerile.
September 19th, 2021
Mixed motives yes, all self serving in the end. I do appreciate the fact that you give actual well thought out arguments. It’s quite refreshing dealing with someone that is actually thinking. As apposed to the slinging insults while pretending moral superiority mob.
September 19th, 2021
We have plenty of cases of the utmost altruism, and we can’t put a window into others’ souls to see what ultimately drives them. People often don’t know themselves. If I think only the worst of people, I can select my evidence accordingly.
September 19th, 2021
@kingabomination, all mammals including humans, are born hardwired to help, but the so called education (and fear) humans are intoxicated with, is making them thinking and behaving unnaturally. How do you explain this behavior of a non brain washed goat which saved a hen from hawk attack:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAGSe7nfOLs
September 19th, 2021
that self serving goat what was she thinking about, we will never find out spending billions on space travel 150 miles(!!!) above ground, how stupid!
September 19th, 2021
It later emerged that the hen owed the goat quite a lot of cash. (From a source close to the hawk.)
September 20th, 2021
Now who’s taking the exceptions to prove the rule. The problem with making decisions based on morality is no one can agree upon what it is. What you think is immoral isn’t necessarily what someone else will. Sure we can all agree upon the extremes, but there’s a lot more gray in the middle than there are extremes. You need look no further than current politics to see that’s self-evident.
September 20th, 2021
You think the hawk is immoral for doing what it was designed to do? The hawk doesn’t think it’s immoral, and I would argue it’s not.
September 20th, 2021
I’d say we’ve progressed radically beyond our hawk phase. We do have empathy & conscience, even many of those who try to suppress their better angels (exceptions always exist). We have cooperation at the level of community; we do have societal standards; we do agree on, and consent to, objective norms within, for inst, the sphere of law/jurisprudence.
Of course, there are subjective variations, but when we breach (or potentially violate) ethical standards the vast majority of us will experience significant compunction, and self-condemnation. The issue does not even have to be extreme, but quite a minor offence, which others may not even notice. This quality tends to keep folks on the rails.
At a very early stage, young children will exhibit anger & upset at unjust & unfair treatment. This conscience thing is fundamental & profound. It does indicate a ground/basis for the vast majority to sustain successful social & ethical dynamics. It gives us the closest thing we have to an objective framework.
September 20th, 2021
Did we progress passed it? The goat only saved the chicken from the flying predator for one walking on two legs. I don’t believe I ever claimed we shouldn’t try to work together. That’s how we progressed to this point. The only point I have tried to make this entire conversation is predatory behavior still exists in humans. You have a very all or nothing perspective. The whole point of this book is knowing the statistics so you can make an informed decision. I find it quite insane that everyone is demonizing it to this degree.
September 20th, 2021
I think we did move beyond it. We’re very complex creatures. I don’t reckon I’m all or nothing, because I’m observing that there are variations, exceptions - a spectrum we operate within. Predatory behaviour exists, but it is mitigated by conscience, empathy, ethical frameworks, societal norms, rules of conduct, cooperation, decency, etc.
I don’t think that we really want to cultivate or celebrate that predatory conduct. Because if we merely objectify or instrumentalise other human beings for selfish gain, it diminishes us. It certainly doesn’t make us happy. The book is what it is, I suppose.
September 20th, 2021
Well I highly doubt there is a single person on this planet that hasn’t been taken advantage of at some point. Excuse me while I continue to believe we haven’t moved passed it, and maintain my healthy scepticism of people’s intentions.
“Objection, evasion, joyous distrust, and love of irony are sighs of health; everything absolute belongs to pathology.”
Friedrich Nietzsche
September 20th, 2021
Passed or past?
September 20th, 2021
Past, thank you
September 20th, 2021
Your weclome!
September 21st, 2021
“Absolute?” Where?
That people are taken advantage of, that’s a given. That a “healthy” programme, philosophy, or life can be framed in disproportionate reaction to that, and then allow this to characterise a person’s life - nah.
That we haven’t moved beyond the level of a pure predator like the hawk - that’s a healthy outlook? That’s not in itself an absolutist perspective?
All for objection, evasion, joyous distrust, & irony. We certainly need more irony.
September 21st, 2021
you keep painting and characterizing my words as absolutes. That doesn’t actually make it so. I don’t know how many times you need me to clarify myself. these are examples that the behavior still exists. I never clamed its the only behavior in existence.
September 22nd, 2021
??? The absolutist traffic was going in the other direction, remember - “You have a very all or nothing perspective” - that’s what I was responding to.
To imagine that we haven’t moved beyond the level of a pure predator like the hawk, as you did say - I would describe that as an absolute position, yeah.
There’s evidence of hawk & evidence of dove (& lots of other fowl behaviour) - why not mitigate hawk & cultivate & celebrate dove? It think it was Lincoln who said “I know the human being & fish can co-exist peacefully.” One day, we hope.
September 22nd, 2021
“Any man who tries to be good all the time is bound to come to ruin among the great number who are not good.”
Niccolo Machiavelli
that’s why you don’t mitigate hawk. The meek will inherit the earth was a mistranslation. Dr. Jordan Peterson has an excellent talk on the subject.
September 22nd, 2021
Of course we mitigate our worst, most predatory instincts. We do it constantly - as much as we can. Imagine if we didn’t, if we consistently acted upon them? However, as I said, they are mitigated by conscience, empathy, ethical frameworks, societal norms, rules of conduct, cooperation, decency, etc.
September 22nd, 2021
all we have done in the western world is exchange physical assassination for character assassination. we try to mitigate our worst through law enforcement and the threat of being locked up. if those things didn’t exist we would quickly devolve into something resembling the middle east. I had 20 chicken wings yesterday for dinner, and I ordered all flats. how many chickens had to die for my single meal? the hawk really cant hold a candle to me. I wasn’t even that hungry. I did it specifically to come back here and tell you about it. that means I was calculated with my cruelty. the hawk isn’t even capable of calculating cruelty for maximum effect. if it was a human it would probably frame its inability to do so as a moral strength. humans often try do disguise there weaknesses as strengths.
September 23rd, 2021
So, the only thing keeping us all from eating people, setting their hair on fire, and raping chickens is a rather inefficient criminal justice system? Not any trace of conscience, empathy, cooperation, etc.? That’s terra absolute, again.
We’ve had semi-apocalyptic situations before - both localised & general - and we didn’t remain as purely hostile hawks, replete with rending talons. We don’t want to live in such a world, for a whole host of complex reasons. We don’t wish to cultivate that aspect of our characters - self-evidently. If we did, we would.
You’ve just mitigated any potential cruelty & harm down to a taste for fine cuisine. Bon Appétit, my fellow gourmand!
September 23rd, 2021
That’s a seriously abominable amount of chicken, all the same. I’d bust the toilet with that volume.
September 24th, 2021
no, these are example of socially expectable predatory behaviors. most of the mitigation examples you gave were socially based.
September 24th, 2021
Do you mean socially acceptable? What’s your specific objection to the point?
September 25th, 2021
yes, socially acceptable. no objection to the point. I was just pointing out that predatory behaviors still exist in spite of social mitigation. in fact, police and military specialize in predatory tactics to enforce the agreed upon standard. predatory behavior is extremely useful. it was only a couple months ago when businesses were getting looted and burned down. that was because they weren’t allowed to to enforce the law. it would very quickly devolve without the criminal justice system. you don’t need everyone’s participation to accomplish that. the people that wouldn’t want to be savages would still need to participate in savagery just to defend themselves.
September 25th, 2021
Oh, right. We still have our own internal, individual checks on extreme conduct: conscience, empathy, cooperation, and all that. We desire stability & human flourishing. Where the state has the monopoly on violence. Otherwise you could see instances where individual wronged parties would seek vengeance, and a spiralling cycle of reprisals might begin. We realise the futility & harm of that from a policy point of view. Keep Charles Bronsons to a statutory minimum.
We might have sporadic, localised breakdowns in order, and self-defence is a valid driver, but we always want a return to the prosperity dynamic - where we can ideally thrive.
We still want the common/social good. We’re also driven by the public benefit & public service.
We don’t need a policeman at our shoulders to enforce compliance in every beneficial act. You don’t, I don’t.
There’s an element when we’re young of, as Falstaff says in Shakespeare, “Let order die!” - where youth can be frustrated with the seemingly slow pace of change, and sober social dynamics. We want it all, and yesterday, dammit.
That’s actually an interesting quote in the context of anarchy: from Henry IV, Part II - “Let heaven kiss earth! Now let not Nature’s hand Keep the wild flood confin’d! Let order die! And let this world no longer be a stage To feed contention in a ling’ring act; But let one spirit of the first-born Cain Reign in all bosoms, that, each heart being set On bloody courses, the rude scene may end And darkness be the burier of the dead!”
I hope the chicken escapade turned out okay.
December 22nd, 2022
@ariddles You sound like a real Simp. Did you write your comment, or did your wife write it for you?
Add a comment